Friday, February 24, 2012

The Evolution of Metal - Genre Analysis Part 1

In my journey to promote my band I keep getting asked "so what's death metal anyway?" and I'm stumped. My first thought is, "well...it's metal....heavier than thrash, and they started it screaming about death and zombies and whatnot". Then go on to explain how a band called Death led by Chuck Schuldiner (a huge inspiration in my guitar playing) that started it all. I'm deciding to write up a more comprehensive overview of the origin of metal. This will be a telling of my own rise through metal as well as heavily supplemented by information from wikipedia. Since I could seriously write forever about this and start it at the part where man learned to smack a stick on a rock in time to create a pleasant rhythm I'm going to do this in parts. Fair warning it may take me a while to get through it all but I'll try for some sort of consistent release. Anyway, without further adieu...

So when your average Joe thinks about metal music, I'm sure the first few things that come to mind are violence, Satan, incomprehensible vocals, and dudes stabbing each-other at concerts. Or they don't think anything at all because they've never heard of this "death metal" they just know it doesn't sound friendly. The problem lies in the mainstream media (as always, misinformation is their way of life). The things I listed do apply to metal, but are far more anecdotal than some over-arching philosophy. Philosophy of Violence....kick ass song name... I digress. When I try and talk to my friends about metal, they always seemed to be concerned with the vocals the most. Yes. A lot of metal is "grr-grr-grr" sounding until you actually open your ears and start listening. In that lies the fact that metal tends to be very loud and busy, and I think the average listener has a hard time sorting out the "noise". I personally enjoy noise. Want to really go outside the box? Check out Sunn O))) (the band took the name from the amplifier brand they use: Sunn). In many of their songs they only have guitar feedback as "music". I find they're a great band to listen to while doing homework. There's stuff going on, but you're not actively listening to it. Also to give myself some ethos, I play guitar in a death metal band and I have been studying metal now for four years. I'm still years away from knowing every band that lead up to this point, but projects are always going to fall to the way-side while the big names get all the credit. I also listen to stuff other than metal such as world music, alt rock, classic rock, tribal, classical, flamenco, . Recently I've been studying the evolution of hip-hop and gangster rap. Funny enough I just now got to where I can tolerate rap at all. For years it all sounded the same but it's all in the subtleties, as with any genre.

So where did this metal junk come from? Well as we learned in class genres evolve from other genres. Metal arose out of heavy metal (odd that "heavy metal" bands are the classics, then just "metal" arose angrier and faster, but I guess they didn't expect it to get any heavier than "heavy metal"). Heavy metal arose from rock and roll along with punk, and that arose from the blues.




I think these fellows would get along just nicely since they came from the same "musical mother" :)

It all begins with jazz and the invention of the electric guitar. Jazz was specifically more a New Orleans tradition compared to the blues which was regionally more spread out and founded it's own subgenres (i.e. Mississippi delta blues or Texas Blues). Jazz took the rules of classical music and threw them out the window, creating very unique, personalized, and improvised music.

Jazz has evolved exponentially since its formation and has dozens of subgenres. Early British Rock bands such as Deep Purple and Led Zeppelin took these blues tunes along with the emergence of rock and roll in the 1940's from greats such as Chuck Berry, and mixed em together to create blues rock, or classic rock as we consider it now.

One huge influence to the creation of metal is Black Sabbath. Black Sabbath (originally a blues band called Earth) introduced a very dark atmosphere and occult lyrics to the music leading to Ozzy's wonderful profiling, as well as a sound in music unlike any before it. A while genre of metal is based on Black Sabbath called "doom metal"; characterized by very slow tempos, droning guitar, sung lyrics, and blues type riffs.

Along side the formation of rock and blues rock, hidden in dingy smoke-filled bars was punk rock which was not only just a music genre, but an explosive sub-culture in the UK and US east coast (and Australia). Bands that let this revolution included Iggy Pop, The Who, The Kinks, and ended the golden era of punk with bands like the Ramones, Sex Pistols, and the Clash. Punk is most recognizable from its Do-It-Yourself lifestyle such as homemade clothing and anti-establishment lyrics. As with any genre, many subgenres sprouted up out of punk including hardcore, Oi!, pop punk, crust punk, anarcho-punk, and even emo music (before emo turned into what it is today, thanks a lot record companies...).

That's a nice beginning to our tale of music. I plan on spending a lot more time on individual bands when I get up to ones that I know stuff about. When we return in part two we'll be looking at the 1970's rise of New Wave of British Heavy Metal and the formation of speed metal and trash metal. Thanks for reading!

Inquiry Contract Abstract

Inquiry Contract Proposal Abstract

In my article I’m going to explore the present and future technologies in the area of space robotics. Major projects currently underway include two rovers exploring the surface of Mars and conducting research as well as the first ever “robonaut” working at the International Space Station. I’m going to explain how the technology currently works along with new ideas still in the lab for robotic interaction. Also I’m going to look at some of the big questions such as will robotics replace manned spaceflight and in what other applications we can use robots for research or even building space structures and repairing satellites.

Thursday, February 16, 2012

Scientific Genres

So far I've encountered a couple different types of scientific genres through internet research on assignments for class varying in complexity. The most interesting one was the most recent, "Transformational Technologies To Expedite Space Access And Development." by John D. G. Rather. The article was about creating new methods of sending stuff into space, but there was a lack of endless mathematical equations that one would expect from such a topic. The author decided to create the paper as a calling to stimulate space research and development. I don't really know what sort of genre the article would fall under. It was published through the American Institute of Physics so not really readily accessible to the general public and the lack of jargon put the article in a field of its own. The author put a lot of personality in the article and you can tell he's very passionate about the subject, it's unlike any article I've read before.

Another genre of scientific article I've encountered is featured in Louisiana Agriculture a quarterly magazine published by the LSU AgCenter. The article I read featured many tables and graphs of fertilizer contaminants in Louisiana's wetlands. The authors explained the graphs very well and the article was quite comprehensible even though I didn't know much about the subject. The genre of that article is for Louisiana farmers, environmentalists, and water management facilitators. I've stumbled upon the highly-technical scientific paper through online databases and they were pretty brutal. I enjoy looking at advance mathematics and pretending to understand what's going on, but unfortunately could not understand the article enough to use it as a resource.

Since I'm going into mechanical engineering, with dreams of specializing in astronautical engineering I imagine I'm going to be writing a lot of research papers about new technologies and designs for spaceflight. Also relating to what we just read in "Writing for Science" and "Accommodating Science" I imagine I'll be writing lab reports, memos to colleagues, and conveying results to a more general audience. So far I've written one abstract in my scientist career, but I have a feeling I'll get more experience before the semester is over. I've also written a few lab reports in my high school chemistry class, but that was a while ago and the teacher laid out the guidelines very specifically so it was hard to error.

Sunday, February 12, 2012

Paper One Reflection

(Sorry this is late)

I feel that I explained one point pretty well, and another two points not so well. I found that I was mixing my information up, and didn't have clear separations in thought. Also neither my paper nor abstract were the required length, so I could have added more content for sure. I'm still having a hard time figuring out when to be concise and when to elaborate and I find myself assuming the reader can fill in the gaps. I do feel that I understood the article well, and knew exactly who my authors intended audiences is, I just failed to communicate that very well. One thing I'm going to do for next assignment is get an earlier start on it. When I had the time to sit there and think about my argument for a couple hours is when i figured out what exactly I was trying to write, but if I had started earlier I would have had more time to revise. Also next time I'm going to try and outline my argument better. During paper one I would come up with new points of argument in the middle of trying to explain something else and got off track and just kinda skimmed a couple different ideas in one paragraph. I have a feeling my grade isn't going to be too wonderful on this paper but hopefully I will be able to improve on my strengths and weaknesses from the first paper.

Thursday, February 2, 2012

Paper One Summary and Outline

The paper I chose is:
Rather, John D. G. "Transformational Technologies To Expedite Space Access And Development." AIP Conference Proceedings 1208.1 (2010): 137-146. Academic Search Complete. Web. 31 Jan. 2012.
(Pretend it's MLA formatted).

********************************************************************************
Summary:

"Transformational Technologies To Expedite Space Access And Development" by John Rather is a suggestion on how superconducting wires can be used to support an electromagnetic launch tube capable of sending spacecraft and building materials out of the atmosphere without the use of on-board fuel. This would significantly decrease the costs of spaceflight, therefor allowing much easier access into space. The author explains that the tube would function like an upside down suspension bridge (140). The launch tube would gradually slope upwards to a height of roughly 12 miles above sea level at the end. The author explains that although the land usage would be high, there are many suitable locations in the U.S. and other countries (142). Near the end of the paper the author also suggests more "futuristic" ideas such as capturing asteroids for building materials, radiation shielding, and even to deflect other Earth-bound celestial rocks (145), and "power beaming" (143). Power beaming is a concept where an concentrated electron beam sends energy from Earth to facilities on the moon or on Mars or vice-versa.

Paper Outline:
I. Introduction
Thesis: This article is aimed at college students and beginning researchers interested in different ideas for the future of space travel.

II. Body
A) Author's style.
--->Very inspiring
--->Calling for a new wave of technological development
--->Defines terms/limited jargon
B) Elements used.
--->Historical background
--->Pictures
--->Hypothetical situations